• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Catholic Review

Catholic Review

Inspiring the Archdiocese of Baltimore

Menu
  • Home
  • News
        • Local News
        • World News
        • Vatican News
        • Obituaries
        • Featured Video
        • En Español
        • Sports News
        • Official Clergy Assignments
        • Schools News
  • Commentary
        • Contributors
          • Question Corner
          • George Weigel
          • Elizabeth Scalia
          • Michael R. Heinlein
          • Effie Caldarola
          • Guest Commentary
        • CR Columnists
          • Archbishop William E. Lori
          • Rita Buettner
          • Christopher Gunty
          • George Matysek Jr.
          • Mark Viviano
          • Father Joseph Breighner
          • Father Collin Poston
          • Robyn Barberry
          • Hanael Bianchi
          • Amen Columns
  • Entertainment
        • Events
        • Movie & Television Reviews
        • Arts & Culture
        • Books
        • Recipes
  • About Us
        • Contact Us
        • Our History
        • Meet Our Staff
        • Photos to own
        • Books/CDs/Prayer Cards
        • CR Media platforms
        • Electronic Edition
  • Advertising
  • Shop
        • Purchase Photos
        • Books/CDs/Prayer Cards
        • Magazine Subscriptions
        • Archdiocesan Directory
  • CR Radio
        • CR Radio
        • Protagonistas de Fe
  • News Tips
  • Subscribe
The Council of the District of Columbia and the mayor have approved a law allowing physician-assisted suicide. Under Article I of our Constitution, Congress has legislative authority over the district and can block that law. Here are three nonpartisan reasons why it should do so.

Death without dignity in the nation’s capital

April 15, 2017
By Richard Doerflinger
Filed Under: Commentary

By Richard Doerflinger

Catholic News Service

Recent partisan impasses in Congress raise the question: Can the two parties agree on anything? 

One issue they should agree on may come up this spring, as appropriations bills for the next fiscal year are debated.
The Council of the District of Columbia and the mayor have approved a law allowing physician-assisted suicide.  

Under Article I of our Constitution, Congress has legislative authority over the district and can block that law. Here are three nonpartisan reasons why it should do so.

First, a constitutional value held dear by liberals and conservatives alike is equal protection. Everyone should have the same basic rights, and “discrimination” is the ultimate fighting word. 
Laws like the district’s are discriminatory: Most people are protected from those who want to end their lives by “assisting” their suicides, but one class of people gets the opposite treatment. All it takes is a guess by two doctors that the patient might have less than six months to live.  
This is not about freedom. Many people, for many reasons, are tempted to suicide. They feel they are acting freely and they may welcome “assistance” in meeting their goal. Their suffering seems worse to them, and longer-lasting, than the pain of terminal illness. 
Government’s response is suicide prevention. But for one group, it will promote suicide assistance instead. That is invidious discrimination by those in power. As columnist Debra Saunders has written, it is “death with a note from Big Brother.”
Second, as two decades of experience in Oregon show, such laws don’t work as supporters claim. They do not take the lives solely of people who are imminently dying. 
People who decide not to take the lethal dose have lived for years; some who do take their lives were diagnosed, and given those pills, in previous years. More than 96 percent of them never get a psychological evaluation, and people with depression and dementia have received the deadly prescription. 
Half the people taking their lives in Oregon say they are doing so because they’ve become a “burden” — a message the law promotes, by implying that the common good is served by their deaths. In this climate, even acts clearly violating the law, such as direct killing by medical professionals, have occurred without prosecution.
Third, Washington, D.C., is the worst place of all for this experiment with people’s lives.  
Oregon is overwhelmingly white and middle-class, with African-Americans making up about 2 percent of the population – and even there, 70 percent of those getting suicide “assistance” have no or only governmental health insurance. Washington is half African-American, with a large urban poor population. One-third of the district’s residents get their coverage through Medicaid.  
African-Americans disproportionately suffer from serious illness and inadequate health care. Black men are more likely to die from prostate cancer, and black women from breast cancer, than their white counterparts. Black men have higher rates of AIDS, diabetes and other conditions that can trigger suicide assistance. They fare badly in having depression diagnosed and treated. And black Americans have been subjected in the past to appalling experiments by doctors and the government, from the Tuskegee syphilis experiment to involuntary sterilization of poor black women.
A final irony is that few practicing doctors in the U.S. — perhaps 5 percent — are African-American. To put it bluntly, Washington will be the place where poor black Americans go to white doctors to die. If that doesn’t send chills up the spine of any progressive, I don’t know what will.
Catholics oppose assisted suicide because it demeans human life. But this issue should be easy for anyone who cares for equality and the rights of the poor. If you believe that black lives matter, you will want your member of Congress to help stop the district’s law.
Doerflinger worked for 36 years in the Secretariat of Pro-Life Activities of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. He writes from Washington state.

Copyright ©2017 Catholic News Service/U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Print Print

Primary Sidebar

Richard Doerflinger

View all posts from this author

| Recent Commentary |

Question Corner: Are the Gospels made up, nonhistorical accounts?

On Ascension, absence and true love

The doors we open

Thérèse of Lisieux: 100 Years of Light

Christ at the center

| Recent Local News |

Bishop Lewandowski installed as bishop of Providence

Bishop Lewandowski adopts new coat of arms

‘Bishop Bruce’ forged strong bonds with Baltimore in challenging times, had heart of a pastor

Deacon Thomas O’Donnell of Catonsville experiences power of papal transition in Rome

Radio Interview: Grow in your relationship with the Blessed Virgin Mary

| Catholic Review Radio |

CatholicReview · Catholic Review Radio

Footer

Our Vision

Real Life. Real Faith. 

Catholic Review Media communicates the Gospel and its impact on people’s lives in the Archdiocese of Baltimore and beyond.

Our Mission

Catholic Review Media provides intergenerational communications that inform, teach, inspire and engage Catholics and all of good will in the mission of Christ through diverse forms of media.

Contact

Catholic Review
320 Cathedral Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
443-524-3150
mail@CatholicReview.org

 

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent

  • Catholic University cuts 7 percent of workforce amid $30 million deficit
  • Trump, Vance meet Pope Leo XIV’s brother in Oval Office
  • Basilian sister in Ukraine to Pope Leo: ‘Thank you’ and ‘come to us’
  • Mexican bishops condemn slaying of 7 young people at parish festival
  • Experts flag concerns over EPPC study on dangers of pill used in miscarriage care, abortion
  • Bishop Lewandowski installed as bishop of Providence
  • Bishop Lewandowski adopts new coat of arms
  • God’s love is generous, not calculating, pope says at first audience
  • Bishops praise, criticize federal actions affecting human life amid budget debate

Search

Membership

Catholic Media Assocation

Maryland-Delaware-DC Press Association

The Associated Church Press

© 2025 CATHOLIC REVIEW MEDIA, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED