• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Catholic Review

Catholic Review

Inspiring the Archdiocese of Baltimore

Menu
  • Home
  • News
        • Local News
        • World News
        • Vatican News
        • Obituaries
        • Featured Video
        • En Español
        • Sports News
        • Official Clergy Assignments
        • Schools News
  • Commentary
        • Contributors
          • Question Corner
          • George Weigel
          • Elizabeth Scalia
          • Michael R. Heinlein
          • Effie Caldarola
          • Guest Commentary
        • CR Columnists
          • Archbishop William E. Lori
          • Rita Buettner
          • Christopher Gunty
          • George Matysek Jr.
          • Mark Viviano
          • Father Joseph Breighner
          • Father Collin Poston
          • Robyn Barberry
          • Hanael Bianchi
          • Amen Columns
  • Entertainment
        • Events
        • Movie & Television Reviews
        • Arts & Culture
        • Books
        • Recipes
  • About Us
        • Contact Us
        • Our History
        • Meet Our Staff
        • Photos to own
        • Books/CDs/Prayer Cards
        • CR Media platforms
        • Electronic Edition
  • Advertising
  • Shop
        • Purchase Photos
        • Books/CDs/Prayer Cards
        • Magazine Subscriptions
        • Archdiocesan Directory
  • CR Radio
        • CR Radio
        • Protagonistas de Fe
  • News Tips
  • Subscribe
A crucifix decorated with palm branches is pictured during Palm Sunday Mass at Sacred Heart Church in Prescott, Ariz., March 24, 2024. (OSV News photo/Bob Roller)

Should Jesus be depicted on crucifixes as alive or dead?

March 27, 2024
By Jenna Marie Cooper
OSV News
Filed Under: Commentary, Question Corner

Q: I have a friend who observed that some crucifixes depict the Savior with his eyes open and some depict him with his eyes closed. He wants to know which is correct — alive or dead? (Lakeland, Fla.)

A: With respect to the second part of your question, I think it’s equally correct for a crucifix to portray Jesus either as still alive on the cross or as just having died. The crucifixion was a progressive event in time, not one static snapshot, so it would be reasonable for an artist to choose to portray any number of given points of this part of Jesus’ passion.

As a parallel, we might think of artistic depictions of the Stations of the Cross: The second station, where Jesus is just taking up his cross, is not any more “correct” than the 14th station, when he is laid in the tomb, despite Jesus being alive in one and already dead in the other.

Considering the broader question of why Jesus’ eyes are open on some crucifixes and closed in others, it occurs to me that a crucifix with Jesus’ eyes closed might not necessarily be intended to show him as having already died. That is, it could be that an eyes-closed crucifix is meant rather to show the intensity of Jesus’ agony.

As far as I can tell, closed eyes on a crucifix does not indicate any specific symbolism on its own, unlike other symbols in Western Christian art that do have a specific meaning. For example, when Our Lady is shown with a white lily, this is understood as a reference to her purity and sinlessness. But the eyes of a crucifix might tell us something about the period in which the artist was working, or the style a modern artist was trying to emulate.

In the church’s first few centuries, crucifixes were not a common symbol at all. It seems that for the early Christians, crucifixion imagery was a bit too jarring — which makes sense when you consider that the early Christians would have known crucifixion as a grisly contemporary method of execution. In early Christian art, it is much more common to see Christ portrayed as the Good Shepherd, or for Christianity to be referenced via other more abstract symbols, such as a fish.

We start seeing more crucifixes around the time of the early Middle Ages, when Christianity became the dominant religion in Europe and parts of the Middle East, and when Christians likely had more of a sense of distance from the brutality of the Roman Empire. But even in this period, crucifixes tended to show Christ as a victorious king. Often in these crucifixes, Jesus’ expression is serene and untroubled, with his eyes wide open and staring ahead.

While this early medieval style of crucifix does express some real truths of our faith — Jesus was indeed victorious on the cross, and he never ceased to trust God his Father — these depictions can tend to engage the intellect more than the emotions.

This is not the case for later crucifixes, especially from what we call the “Counter-Reformation” period in the late 1500s. Alongside trends in Western art in general, these crucifixes often show Jesus in a very lifelike, naturalistic way, where his suffering is depicted in realistic and often graphic detail. The goal of this style was to touch the heart of its viewers, to help move their souls to greater love of the suffering Christ and to greater sorrow for their sins. This makes sense for this period in church history, as this was a time when the church — often though saints such as Teresa of Avila, John of the Cross, and Ignatius of Loyola — was calling the faithful to a greater spirit of penance and a more personal engagement in prayer after some of the abuses that occurred in the medieval period.

Read More Question Corner

Question Corner: Do Catholics have a theological problem with a woman being the Archbishop of Canterbury?

Question Corner: Should girls be altar servers?

Question Corner: Is confession required for obtaining a plenary indulgence if there is no mortal sin?

Question Corner: Why is Mary’s perpetual virginity so important to Catholics?

Question Corner: Why is New Year’s Day a holy day of obligation?

Question Corner: What does the term ‘protomartyr’ mean?

Copyright © 2024 OSV News

Print Print

Primary Sidebar

Jenna Marie Cooper

View all posts from this author

| Recent Commentary |

Putting away Christmas

Getting to know our sacred space

Question Corner: Do Catholics have a theological problem with a woman being the Archbishop of Canterbury?

P.D. James and designer parkas for chihuahuas

Embracing the Prince of Peace

| Recent Local News |

Sister Sigrid Simlik, former teacher in Baltimore, dies at 97

Archbishop Lori announces clergy appointments, including associate pastors

Monsignor Slade student, family driven to help 

One man, three schools: Campus minister promotes Jesuit mission 

Snowstorm shuts schools, challenges parishes and boosts shelter need in Archdiocese of Baltimore

| Catholic Review Radio |

Footer

Our Vision

Real Life. Real Faith. 

Catholic Review Media communicates the Gospel and its impact on people’s lives in the Archdiocese of Baltimore and beyond.

Our Mission

Catholic Review Media provides intergenerational communications that inform, teach, inspire and engage Catholics and all of good will in the mission of Christ through diverse forms of media.

Contact

Catholic Review
320 Cathedral Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
443-524-3150
mail@CatholicReview.org

 

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent

  • Noem unlawfully ended Venezuelan, Haitian deportation protections, says appeals court
  • Sister Sigrid Simlik, former teacher in Baltimore, dies at 97
  • Science teacher honors Challenger crew’s memory by encouraging curiosity, resilience, faith
  • South Sudan bishops warn of genocide, plead for peace as fears of a full-scale war grow
  • Deadly violence in Minneapolis tied to ICE agents is ‘unacceptable,’ top cardinal says
  • Lack of faith, especially among youth, should spur evangelization, pope says
  • First woman to lead Church of England in its 1,400-year history confirmed in ceremony
  • Trump administration asks federal court to pause Louisiana’s abortion pill challenge
  • Getting to know our sacred space

Search

Membership

Catholic Media Assocation

Maryland-Delaware-DC Press Association

The Associated Church Press

© 2026 CATHOLIC REVIEW MEDIA, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED