• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Catholic Review

Catholic Review

Inspiring the Archdiocese of Baltimore

Menu
  • Home
  • News
        • Local News
        • World News
        • Vatican News
        • Obituaries
        • Featured Video
        • En Español
        • Sports News
        • Official Clergy Assignments
        • Schools News
  • Commentary
        • Contributors
          • Question Corner
          • George Weigel
          • Effie Caldarola
          • John Garvey
          • Father Ed Dougherty, M.M.
          • Guest Commentary
        • CR Columnists
          • Archbishop William E. Lori
          • Rita Buettner
          • Christopher Gunty
          • George Matysek Jr.
          • Father Joseph Breighner
          • Father Collin Poston
          • Robyn Barberry
          • Hanael Bianchi
          • Amen Columns
  • Entertainment
        • Events
        • Movie & Television Reviews
        • Arts & Culture
        • Books
        • Recipes
  • About Us
        • Contact Us
        • Our History
        • Meet Our Staff
        • Photos to own
        • Books/CDs/Prayer Cards
        • CR Media platforms
        • Electronic Edition
  • Advertising
  • Shop
        • Purchase Photos
        • Books/CDs/Prayer Cards
        • Magazine Subscriptions
        • Archdiocesan Directory
  • CR Radio
  • News Tips
  • Subscribe
Migrants at a camp near the banks of the Rio Bravo in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, make a large banner in the likeness of the U.S. flag Oct. 30, 2022. (CNS photo/Jose Luis Gonzalez, Reuters)

Supreme Court examines Biden’s immigration enforcement policy

November 30, 2022
By Carol Zimmermann
Catholic News Service
Filed Under: Feature, Immigration and Migration, News, Supreme Court, World News

WASHINGTON (CNS) — Supreme Court justices Nov. 29 examined a Biden administration policy that placed the arrest and deportation of some unauthorized immigrants over others.

In oral arguments that lasted more than two hours, the court seemed divided over the challenge to the administration’s policy that put a priority on deporting immigrants who pose a threat to national security, public safety or border security.

A child in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, stands as police remove Venezuelan migrants from a camp on the banks of the Rio Grande Nov. 27, 2022. (CNS photo/Jose Luis Gonzalez, Reuters)

The policy has been challenged by Texas and Louisiana officials who claim federal law does not provide the options for enforcing which immigrants can be singled out for deportation.

The case focused on a 2021 memo from Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas outlining priorities for the arrest, detention and deportation of immigrants.

In June, a Texas-based federal judge blocked this policy. The following month the  Supreme Court in a 5-4 vote rejected the Biden administration’s request to restore the policy, but agreed to hear oral arguments about it.

Several justices Nov. 29 seemed ready to side with the two states arguing their legal right to challenge the administration’s policy.

A few of the justices repeatedly emphasized that federal immigration law says that some immigrants “shall” be taken into custody or deported, indicating that the administration didn’t have option to pick and choose who they would focus on.

“Shall means shall,” Chief Justice John Roberts said. “Shouldn’t we just say what the law is?” he asked, but he also acknowledged the administration’s argument that Congress had not allocated necessary funds for the government to try to remove every noncitizen.

The 2021 memo from Mayorkas said there are approximately 11 million immigrants in the country without documentation, and the government does not have the ability to apprehend and remove all of them, which is why the Biden administration issued priorities as to who should be targeted for deportation.

Texas and Louisiana lawyers argued that the Department of Homeland Security’s guidelines went against federal immigration law.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the administration, said DHS could not possibly apprehend and seek the removal of all the immigrants living in the country illegally.

She also said the two states should not have been able to challenge the policy since they have not suffered direct harm because of it.

Kate Melloy Goettel, director of litigation for the American Immigration Council, said in a statement that this case gave the Supreme Court the “best opportunity in years to affirm the federal government’s well-established authority to set its own enforcement priorities and choose who it targets for deportation — and who it doesn’t.”

She also noted that the country’s immigration system “works better when federal officials decide when to prioritize immigration enforcement.”

“States like Texas have repeatedly sought to make our immigration system harsher and more inhumane by overturning federal immigration authority in a manner inconsistent with our immigration laws and years of court precedent,” she added.

She urged the court to “reject Texas’ ill-conceived argument that immigration laws impose affirmative obligations on ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) to carry out arrests against their considered judgment.”

A decision in United States v. Texas is expected next June.


Follow Zimmermann on Twitter: @carolmaczim

Read More Immigration & Migration

Pope Francis says situation at U.S.-Mexico border is ‘serious problem’

Black Cuban recounts his flight as a child refugee from Castro’s regime in ‘Operation Pedro Pan’

Catholic immigration advocates called for just policy as Title 42 expires

As Title 42 ends and Title 8 is fully reinstated, what are some of the implications for migrants?

At the border, anxieties mount as Title 42 is lifted

People should be free to choose, not forced, to migrate, pope says in message

Copyright © 2022 Catholic News Service/U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops

Print Print

Primary Sidebar

Carol Zimmermann

Catholic News Service is a leading agency for religious news. Its mission is to report fully, fairly and freely on the involvement of the church in the world today.

View all posts from this author

For the latest news delivered twice a week via email or text message, sign up to receive our free enewsletter.

| MOST POPULAR |

  • Assault outside Planned Parenthood office leaves pregnancy center employees shaken
  • Pope Francis says situation at U.S.-Mexico border is ‘serious problem’
  • Missionary of mercy priest: ‘Be Christ to all people’ in a world ‘hungry for the Word’
  • As COVID’s emergency phase ends, Catholic experts share takeaways for the church
  • Question Corner: Must I make my confession at the altar, as my pastor asks?

| Latest Local News |

Bishop Victor Galeone, former Archdiocese of Baltimore priest and bishop of St. Augustine, dies at 87

Assault outside Planned Parenthood office leaves pregnancy center employees shaken

RADIO INTERVIEW: The Prosperity Gospel

| Latest World News |

Archbishop: Months leading to synod are times for faithful to live response to divine grace ‘more intensely’

Numbers of Irish Catholics are falling rapidly; only half of Dublin residents say they’re Catholic

Nationals pitcher, Dodgers players join chorus criticizing LA team for plan to honor ‘Sisters’ drag group

| Catholic Review Radio |

CatholicReview · Catholic Review Radio

Footer

Our Vision

Real Life. Real Faith. 

Catholic Review Media communicates the Gospel and its impact on people’s lives in the Archdiocese of Baltimore and beyond.

Our Mission

Catholic Review Media provides intergenerational communications that inform, teach, inspire and engage Catholics and all of good will in the mission of Christ through diverse forms of media.

Contact

Catholic Review
320 Cathedral Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
443-524-3150
mail@CatholicReview.org

 

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent

  • Movie Review: ‘Padre Pio’
  • Meet the new priests to be ordained in 2023
  • Archbishop: Months leading to synod are times for faithful to live response to divine grace ‘more intensely’
  • Numbers of Irish Catholics are falling rapidly; only half of Dublin residents say they’re Catholic
  • In June, let your garden honor the hearts of Jesus and Mary
  • Nationals pitcher, Dodgers players join chorus criticizing LA team for plan to honor ‘Sisters’ drag group
  • A host of sacramental statistics: Vatican tracks practice of the faith
  • Bishop Victor Galeone, former Archdiocese of Baltimore priest and bishop of St. Augustine, dies at 87
  • Videogame Review: ‘The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom’

Search

Membership

Catholic Press Association of the United States and Canada

Maryland-Delaware-DC Press Association

The Associated Church Press

© 2023 CATHOLIC REVIEW MEDIA, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED