• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Catholic Review

Catholic Review

Inspiring the Archdiocese of Baltimore

Menu
  • Home
  • News
        • Local News
        • World News
        • Vatican News
        • Obituaries
        • Featured Video
        • En Español
        • Sports News
        • Official Clergy Assignments
        • Schools News
  • Commentary
        • Contributors
          • Question Corner
          • George Weigel
          • Elizabeth Scalia
          • Michael R. Heinlein
          • Effie Caldarola
          • Guest Commentary
        • CR Columnists
          • Archbishop William E. Lori
          • Rita Buettner
          • Christopher Gunty
          • George Matysek Jr.
          • Mark Viviano
          • Father Joseph Breighner
          • Father Collin Poston
          • Amen Columns
  • Entertainment
        • Events
        • Movie & Television Reviews
        • Arts & Culture
        • Books
        • Recipes
        • CR for Kids
  • About Us
        • Contact Us
        • Our History
        • Meet Our Staff
        • Photos to own
        • Shop
        • CR Media platforms
        • Electronic Edition
        • Subscribe
  • Advertising
  • Kids
  • Radio/Podcasts
        • Catholic Review Radio
        • Protagonistas de Fe
        • In God’s Image
        • “In Charity and Truth” with Archbishop William E. Lori
  • News Tips
  • Subscribe
A hand holds a wedding ring in this undated illustration photo. (OSV News photo/Mike Crupi)

Question Corner: How do you proceed if an ex refuses to be a part of the annulment process?

March 19, 2026
By Jenna Marie Cooper
OSV News
Filed Under: Commentary, Question Corner

Q: How do you proceed if the ex refuses to be a part of the annulment process? Are you stalled from moving forward? It seems to give the ex-spouse power over your spiritual growth and direction.

A: The short answer is that while Catholic marriage tribunals are required to inform the respondent that a marriage nullity process is taking place, and must give the respondent every opportunity to participate, at the end of the day the process can still move forward even if the respondent chooses not to be involved for whatever reason.

To review some background information, the Church’s canon law sets out a series of steps and principles in a marriage nullity process — i.e., the process for obtaining what is popularly termed an “annulment” — in order to discern the truth of whether or not a particular marriage was valid from its beginning.

Specifically, the individual actively seeking the declaration of nullity, called the petitioner, approaches the Church via the local marriage tribunal with their story of why they believe there was a problem present at the very beginning of their union that was serious enough and of a such a nature that would have rendered their matrimonial commitment invalid.

An important principle in the Church’s law regarding the marriage nullity process is treating both spouses as fairly as possible. The respondent is the other party involved in a nullity case.

Since the respondent was an equal party in the marriage, they are an equal party in a marriage nullity case and thus have all the same rights in canon law as the petitioner does, although, practically speaking, particular respondents might have varying levels of interest or concern as to what happens.

Because of this, the Church’s law strictly requires that the respondent be informed of a pending marriage nullity trial and allowed to participate in the process fully — to the point where, if this is neglected, the entire nullity trial itself might be rendered null and void (See for example Canon 1620, 7 of the Code of Canon Law).

If we consider the relevant canon law very technically, the tribunal’s citation of the respondent is actually akin to a subpoena in secular civil law. However, unlike the secular courts that have the power to arrest or fine those who don’t comply with their directives, the Church is unable to use coercive force to compel an unwilling respondent to participate. And even if the Church could do this, there is a concern to make the experience of the marriage nullity process as pastorally sensitive as possible, meaning that tribunal officially are appropriately reluctant to put a respondent through the emotional strain of a nullity trial if he or she is genuinely unwilling.

In light of this, if a tribunal knows for sure that a respondent is aware of their pending nullity case, but either does not hear back from the respondent or is told explicitly by the respondent that they want no further contact from the tribunal, there is a provision in canon law for declaring the respondent “absent” (See Canon 1592). This basically means that the nullity trial can move forward even without the respondent’s participation, although the respondent can still opt back in at any time.

But in the big picture, I think it’s important to point out that a respondent never has the power to stall a petitioner’s spiritual growth or healing. Even if a respondent’s refusal to participate in the marriage nullity process makes it difficult for a petitioner to prove their case, an individual’s spiritual growth is never wholly dependent on the decisions of the marriage tribunal.

Anyone in any kind of situation can always choose to grow closer to God, although sometimes this might involve a call to take up the cross, as might happen if someone in an irregular marriage resolves to embrace a life of chastity according to the Church’s teachings.

Jenna Marie Cooper, who holds a licentiate in canon law, is a consecrated virgin and a canonist whose column appears weekly at OSV News. Send your questions to CatholicQA@osv.com.

Read More Question Corner

Question Corner: Would a vow renewal impact a future annulment?

Question Corner: Should a priest do a Mass intention ‘for the people of the parish’ when there are more specific intentions waiting?

Question Corner: Can a Catholic priest attend a non-Catholic wedding reception as a guest?

Question Corner: What does it mean if a couple is asked to ‘live as brother and sister’ during an annulment process?

Question Corner: When does a priest promise celibacy in the ordination process?

Question Corner: Will everyone know each other’s sins at the last judgement?

Copyright © 2026 OSV News

Print Print

Primary Sidebar

Jenna Marie Cooper

View all posts from this author

| Recent Commentary |

‘Alone’: Lessons from the wilderness

Firefighter rides on the back of a vintage fire engine

A Fourth of July Memory

Question Corner: Would a vow renewal impact a future annulment?

A child holds a plush mustard figure

Relishing a 7th Birthday with Mustard

Question Corner: Should a priest do a Mass intention ‘for the people of the parish’ when there are more specific intentions waiting?

| Recent Local News |

Archdiocese of Baltimore responds to growing immigration enforcement

Navigating the leap to high school

Faith, freedom and the founders: How Maryland Catholics helped shape a new nation

Radio Interview: Vatican journalist Carol Glatz shares insights on Pope Leo and covering the Church from Rome

Meet four shining lights from the Class of 2026

| Catholic Review Radio |

Footer

Our Vision

Real Life. Real Faith. 

Catholic Review Media communicates the Gospel and its impact on people’s lives in the Archdiocese of Baltimore and beyond.

Our Mission

Catholic Review Media provides intergenerational communications that inform, teach, inspire and engage Catholics and all of good will in the mission of Christ through diverse forms of media.

Contact

Catholic Review
320 Cathedral Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
443-524-3150
mail@CatholicReview.org

 

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent

  • ‘Alone’: Lessons from the wilderness
  • Home viewing roundup: What’s available to stream and what’s on the horizon
  • La Arquidiócesis de Baltimore responde al creciente control de la inmigración
  • Archdiocese of Baltimore responds to growing immigration enforcement
  • Prayer key to sister’s release from ICE detention, but foreign-born religious now on edge
  • SSPX carries out unauthorized consecration of 4 bishops despite pope’s warningagainst it
  • Navigating the leap to high school
  • Supreme Court finds Trump executive order on birthright citizenship unconstitutional
  • Faith, freedom and the founders: How Maryland Catholics helped shape a new nation

Search

Membership

Catholic Media Assocation

Maryland-Delaware-DC Press Association

The Associated Church Press

© 2026 CATHOLIC REVIEW MEDIA, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED